Difference: JPEG2000 (11 vs. 12)

Revision 1213 Dec 2015 - MartinTurner

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
“Beliefs are ideas going bald” a remark credited to Andre Breton et al.

Details regarding JPEG 2000

Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
  • A jpeg 2000 decoder written in javascript: https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/blob/master/src/core/jpx.js
Added:
>
>
  • openjpeg notes for year 2015 "0) Moved to GitHub: git work flow, pull requests instead of patches, integration with Appveyor and Travis 1) Fixed a huge number of bugs. I would guess that the library is more stable and correct than it has ever been in the past.2) Improved the test suite: more test cases, integration with JPylyzer 3) Became an official reference implementation of the Jpeg 2000 standard"
  Lossless mode: Experiment from Forum. The compression is: 40421376 >> 15735885 (0.389 ratio) (in 10s) rearrange raw image to interleave all bayer components, and used -F 2752,1836,4,12,u , but the compression is worse: 19175592 (ratio 0.474) with Bzip2, the result size is 17934600 (0.444 ratio) (in 8.3s)
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright & by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback